Takuya Kumasaka vs Sidharth Rawat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Rawat holds an advantage on second serve success, winning 47.99% of points compared to Kumasaka's 41.74%. Does this give Rawat an edge? It appears so in recent performance trends.
• Return Game Stats: While Rawat has a slight edge in first serve return points at 30.86% to Kumasaka's 28.96%, Kumasaka outshines in returning second serves with 46.25% compared to Rawat's 42.8%. Could this factor influence the match dynamics?
• Pressure Situations: Rawat seems more resilient under pressure, saving 55.1% of breakpoints, whereas Kumasaka saves 48.48%. Breakpoint resilience could be pivotal in tight situations.
• Overall Performance: Kumasaka has a superior win rate over the past year at 64.91%, compared to Rawat's 52.73%. Does this track record favor Kumasaka as the likely victor?
• Surface Performance: Both players excel on Hard courts, with Kumasaka slightly better at 60% compared to Rawat's 54%. Could the surface be Kumasaka's battleground?
• Deciding Sets & Extreme Pressure: Historically, neither has won a deciding set against each other, yet Kumasaka performs better overall with a 60% win rate compared to Rawat's 46% in deciding sets.
• Break Point Conversion: Kumasaka is notably more effective in converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 46.67% against Rawat's 30.51%. Is this efficiency a deciding factor?
• Direct H2H Results: Kumasaka leads their head-to-head face-off 1-0, including a straight-set victory on Hard courts, suggesting a psychological or strategic upper hand.
• Quality of Opponents: Rawat has competed against slightly stronger opponents, with an average rank of 404.6 versus Kumasaka's 508.96, which might prepare Rawat better for tougher matches.

Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):

The comparison of second serve effectiveness puts Rawat at a relative advantage, as this metric often correlates with match success. However, Kumasaka's superior return efficiency, especially against second serves, may diminish this edge.

Despite Rawat's better performance in pressure scenarios, Kumasaka’s higher breakpoint conversion rate and solid head-to-head lead suggest a consistent advantage. Additionally, Kumasaka's overall superior win rate over the year and better execution on Hard courts tip the balance further in his favor.

While Rawat's experience with stronger opposition is a factor, it is overshadowed by Kumasaka’s head-to-head and surface performance, likely making Kumasaka the winner in the upcoming clash.